Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.

Link to this comparison view

Both sides previous revision Previous revision
Next revision
Previous revision
Last revision Both sides next revision
2016:program:tim_maudlin [2016/06/28 20:06]
berislav
2016:program:tim_maudlin [2016/06/30 21:28]
berislav
Line 1: Line 1:
-{{wp>tim_maudlin}}+ 
 +====== Topology and the Structure of Space-Time ====== 
 + 
 +<​blockquote>​ 
 +**Tim Maudlin** 
 + 
 +[{{  :​maudlin.png?​330|Tim Maudlin}}] 
 + 
 +Mathematical representations of physical entities are shaped by the mathematical tools used to create them. Space, time, and space-time have traditionally been represented by topological spaces: sets of points that are knit together, at the most fundamental level, by a structure of open sets that satisfies the axioms of standard topology. ​ Notions such as the connectedness of a space, the boundary of a set, and the continuity of a function are defined by reference to these open sets. Additional geometrical structure (such as metrical or affine structure) can be added to a topological space, but the mathematical representation typically 
 +begins with a topological manifold. 
 + 
 +I will argue that standard topology is wrong mathematical tool to use for representing the structure of space and time (or space-time). I will present an alternative mathematical tool, the Theory of Linear Structures, whose primitive notion is the line rather than the open set. The Theory of Linear Structures has a wider field of useful application than topology in that it can be used to capture the geometry of discrete spaces as well as continua. It provides alternative,​ non-equivalent definitions of, e.g., 
 +connectedness,​ boundaries, and the continuity of a function. And it offers a more detailed account of the sub-metrical geometry of a space: every Linear Structure induces a topology on a space, but many different Linear Structures give rise to the same topology. 
 + 
 +Using the Theory of Linear Structures rather than standard topology to describe space-time has a powerful ontological payoff: one can show that the basic organizing principle of a Relativistic space-time (but not a classical space-time) is time. Contrary to common belief, Relativity does not //​spatialize time//, it rather //​temporalizes space//​.</​blockquote>​ 
 + 
 + 
 + 
 + 
 + 
 +---- 
 + 
 +{{wp>Tim_Maudlin}}