Differences
This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.
| Both sides previous revision Previous revision Next revision | Previous revision | ||
|
2014:berislav_zarnic [2014/09/16 23:40] berislav [Disjunctive Facts and Superposition of States] |
2014:berislav_zarnic [2015/05/18 23:06] (current) berislav [Disjunctive Facts and Superposition of States] |
||
|---|---|---|---|
| Line 6: | Line 6: | ||
| <blockquote>{{ :schrodinger_cat.png|}}**Abstract** | <blockquote>{{ :schrodinger_cat.png|}}**Abstract** | ||
| - | Let us denote by `$\mathsf{descriptum}(p \sqcup q)$' the unobservable state of affairs described by the 'quantum disjunction' of basic physical propositions $p$ and $q$ describing mutually exclusive (`orthogonal') observable states. | + | Let us denote by $\mathsf{descriptum}(p \sqcup q)$ the unobservable state of affairs described by the 'quantum disjunction' of basic physical propositions $p$ and $q$ describing mutually exclusive (`orthogonal') observable states. |
| No such disjunctively composed state of affairs is allowed by //Tractarian// postulate of unique mode of composition of states of affairs. | No such disjunctively composed state of affairs is allowed by //Tractarian// postulate of unique mode of composition of states of affairs. | ||
| Quite the opposite holds true in the (realistic interpretation of) quantum mechanics: it allows mutually exclusive states of affairs of the same object and the same magnitude to co-exist. | Quite the opposite holds true in the (realistic interpretation of) quantum mechanics: it allows mutually exclusive states of affairs of the same object and the same magnitude to co-exist. | ||
| Line 14: | Line 14: | ||
| </blockquote> | </blockquote> | ||
| + | |||
| + | ---- | ||
| {{amazon>en:9400793782 noprice =0}} | {{amazon>en:9400793782 noprice =0}} | ||