Differences
This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.
| Both sides previous revision Previous revision Next revision | Previous revision | ||
|
2014:slobodan_perovic [2014/06/24 09:36] berislav |
2014:slobodan_perovic [2014/07/25 09:55] (current) berislav |
||
|---|---|---|---|
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| + | <wrap round todo 60%> | ||
| + | Paper presented by title. | ||
| + | </wrap> | ||
| + | |||
| + | ====== Niels Bohr's Complementarity: The Experimentalist Method And The Experimental Phenomena Behind It ====== | ||
| + | |||
| + | |||
| - | ====== Niels Bohr's Comeplementarity: The Experimentalist Method And The Experimental Phenomena Behind It ====== | ||
| [[http://perovich.tripod.com/|Slobodan Perović]] | [[http://perovich.tripod.com/|Slobodan Perović]] | ||
| - | \\ //Department of Philosophy, University of Belgrade, Serbia// | + | \\ <fs 75%>//Department of Philosophy, University of Belgrade, Serbia//</fs> |
| <blockquote> **Abstract** I identify a strong undercurrent of Baconian method of induction in Niels Bohr’s work that likely emerged during his experimental training and practice. When its development is analyzed in light of Baconian induction, complementarity emerges as a levelheaded rather than a controversial account. It is carefully elicited from a comprehensive grasp of the available experimental basis, shunning hasty metaphysically motivated generalizations based on partial experimental evidence. I explore the nature of experimental phenomena that enables such a method to be successful.</blockquote> | <blockquote> **Abstract** I identify a strong undercurrent of Baconian method of induction in Niels Bohr’s work that likely emerged during his experimental training and practice. When its development is analyzed in light of Baconian induction, complementarity emerges as a levelheaded rather than a controversial account. It is carefully elicited from a comprehensive grasp of the available experimental basis, shunning hasty metaphysically motivated generalizations based on partial experimental evidence. I explore the nature of experimental phenomena that enables such a method to be successful.</blockquote> | ||