Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.

Link to this comparison view

Both sides previous revision Previous revision
Next revision
Previous revision
2013:start2013 [2014/07/26 09:35]
berislav
2013:start2013 [2017/01/26 12:56] (current)
berislav
Line 1: Line 1:
  
 +<WRAP center round box>
 ====== The Second Physics and Philosophy Meeting ====== ====== The Second Physics and Philosophy Meeting ======
- 
- 
-===== Why $\Phi \& \Phi$? ===== 
- 
- 
- 
  
  
 <WRAP half column> <WRAP half column>
 [{{  :​2013:​sokolic.png?​150|Franjo Sokolić}}] [{{  :​2013:​sokolic.png?​150|Franjo Sokolić}}]
 +===== Why $\Phi \& \Phi$? =====
 This Meeting is organized with the aim to develop the dialogue between natural sciences and philosophy. Unfortunately,​ there is generally a lack of contacts in this sense, and in our country particularly. This has negative consequences on the general attitude of both, natural scientists and philosophers. They do not see what would be the benefit of their acquaintance with the other discipline. Scientists and the students of science perceive philosophy as of no bearing on their own work and interests. On the other side, philosophers and those interested in philosophy perceive natural science as too technical, and of no importance for their general worldview. This is in contradiction with a long tradition in which sciences emanated from philosophy. The effort of specialisation in this reductionist paradigm has as a side product the loss of the global view. This Meeting is organized with the aim to develop the dialogue between natural sciences and philosophy. Unfortunately,​ there is generally a lack of contacts in this sense, and in our country particularly. This has negative consequences on the general attitude of both, natural scientists and philosophers. They do not see what would be the benefit of their acquaintance with the other discipline. Scientists and the students of science perceive philosophy as of no bearing on their own work and interests. On the other side, philosophers and those interested in philosophy perceive natural science as too technical, and of no importance for their general worldview. This is in contradiction with a long tradition in which sciences emanated from philosophy. The effort of specialisation in this reductionist paradigm has as a side product the loss of the global view.
    
Line 23: Line 19:
  
 //Franjo Sokolić, 2013.// //Franjo Sokolić, 2013.//
 +</​WRAP>​
 </​WRAP>​ </​WRAP>​