Differences
This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.
Next revision | Previous revision | ||
2016:program:tim_maudlin [2016/06/28 20:06] berislav created |
2016:program:tim_maudlin [2016/07/01 21:58] (current) berislav |
||
---|---|---|---|
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
- | {wp>tim_maudlin}} | + | |
+ | ====== Topology and the Structure of Space-Time ====== | ||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | **Tim Maudlin** | ||
+ | \\ //Department of Philosophy//, New York University | ||
+ | |||
+ | <blockquote> | ||
+ | [{{ :maudlin.png?330|Tim Maudlin}}] | ||
+ | |||
+ | Mathematical representations of physical entities are shaped by the mathematical tools used to create them. Space, time, and space-time have traditionally been represented by topological spaces: sets of points that are knit together, at the most fundamental level, by a structure of open sets that satisfies the axioms of standard topology. Notions such as the connectedness of a space, the boundary of a set, and the continuity of a function are defined by reference to these open sets. Additional geometrical structure (such as metrical or affine structure) can be added to a topological space, but the mathematical representation typically | ||
+ | begins with a topological manifold. | ||
+ | |||
+ | I will argue that standard topology is wrong mathematical tool to use for representing the structure of space and time (or space-time). I will present an alternative mathematical tool, the Theory of Linear Structures, whose primitive notion is the line rather than the open set. The Theory of Linear Structures has a wider field of useful application than topology in that it can be used to capture the geometry of discrete spaces as well as continua. It provides alternative, non-equivalent definitions of, e.g., | ||
+ | connectedness, boundaries, and the continuity of a function. And it offers a more detailed account of the sub-metrical geometry of a space: every Linear Structure induces a topology on a space, but many different Linear Structures give rise to the same topology. | ||
+ | |||
+ | Using the Theory of Linear Structures rather than standard topology to describe space-time has a powerful ontological payoff: one can show that the basic organizing principle of a Relativistic space-time (but not a classical space-time) is time. Contrary to common belief, Relativity does not //spatialize time//, it rather //temporalizes space//.</blockquote> | ||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | ---- | ||
+ | |||
+ | {{wp>Tim_Maudlin}} |