Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.

Link to this comparison view

Both sides previous revision Previous revision
Next revision 		Previous revision
2016:program:tim_maudlin [2016/06/28 20:07]
berislav 		2016:program:tim_maudlin [2016/07/01 21:58] (current)
berislav
Line 1: Line 1:
 +
 +====== Topology and the Structure of Space-Time ======
 +
 +
 +**Tim Maudlin**
 + \\ //​Department of Philosophy//,​ New York University
 +
 +<​blockquote>​
 +[{{  :​maudlin.png?​330|Tim Maudlin}}]
 +
 +Mathematical representations of physical entities are shaped by the mathematical tools used to create them. Space, time, and space-time have traditionally been represented by topological spaces: sets of points that are knit together, at the most fundamental level, by a structure of open sets that satisfies the axioms of standard topology. ​ Notions such as the connectedness of a space, the boundary of a set, and the continuity of a function are defined by reference to these open sets. Additional geometrical structure (such as metrical or affine structure) can be added to a topological space, but the mathematical representation typically
 +begins with a topological manifold.
 +
 +I will argue that standard topology is wrong mathematical tool to use for representing the structure of space and time (or space-time). I will present an alternative mathematical tool, the Theory of Linear Structures, whose primitive notion is the line rather than the open set. The Theory of Linear Structures has a wider field of useful application than topology in that it can be used to capture the geometry of discrete spaces as well as continua. It provides alternative,​ non-equivalent definitions of, e.g.,
 +connectedness,​ boundaries, and the continuity of a function. And it offers a more detailed account of the sub-metrical geometry of a space: every Linear Structure induces a topology on a space, but many different Linear Structures give rise to the same topology.
 +
 +Using the Theory of Linear Structures rather than standard topology to describe space-time has a powerful ontological payoff: one can show that the basic organizing principle of a Relativistic space-time (but not a classical space-time) is time. Contrary to common belief, Relativity does not //​spatialize time//, it rather //​temporalizes space//​.</​blockquote>​
 +
 +
 +
 +
 +
 +----
 +
 {{wp>​Tim_Maudlin}} {{wp>​Tim_Maudlin}}