Differences
This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.
Next revision | Previous revision | ||
2017:conf_talk8 [2017/05/11 21:49] berislav created |
2017:conf_talk8 [2017/05/15 22:32] (current) sokolic |
||
---|---|---|---|
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
- | ====== Talk title ====== | + | ====== Does Non-Relativistic Quantum Theory Exist? ====== |
- | **Name and Surname** | + | **Tim Maudlin, Ph.D. Professor** |
- | \\ //Affiliation// | + | \\ //New York University, USA// |
<blockquote> | <blockquote> | ||
- | Abstract | + | Many conceptual investigations into the possible ways to interpret the quantum formalism begin with the examination of the non-relativistic theory. For many purposes, this appears to be a good strategy. For example, if one is interested in how one could solve the measurement problem, there are non-relativistic theories that illustrate the various approaches, such as Bohmian mechanics, GRW, and Many Worlds. Having understood the non-relativistic case, one then asks how the basic form of the solution might be extended to the relativistic domain. |
+ | This same strategy can be attempted when asking about the ontological status of the wavefunction. Questions about whether and how the mathematical object represents a physical reality can be asked in the non-relativistic setting, and the answers there used to inform investigation into the relativistic setting. I will suggest that this sort of approach may be seriously misleading, and that, in a particular sense, there is no non-relativistic version of quantum theory. | ||
</blockquote> | </blockquote> |